Ad results
Read campaign results before the weekly report.
Research · Example capabilityMake builds scenarios module by module on a visual canvas, now with AI agents in open beta. SpringBrand turns a task you describe into an agent that runs on schedule and improves every run. Compare SpringBrand vs Make.
Interactive design preview · Curated examples, no live Agent runs
A fictional example of an agent that reads both ad platforms and writes the weekly summary.
| Campaign | Last week | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 01Search · Brand | Cost per lead down 9% | On track |
| 02Meta · Retargeting | Click-through down 30% | New creative |
| 03Search · Competitor | Spend up 40%, 2 leads | Review |
Brand search is on track. Retargeting creative is wearing out, so the report suggests two new variants; competitor terms spent more for few leads and need a decision.
Ad results → one report → changes to review
Choose Make when you want to see and control every module on a visual canvas, especially for heavy data transformations that must run the same way each time.
Choose SpringBrand as your Make alternative when the job changes from run to run — ad reports, content and research — and you would rather describe it once than keep a growing canvas of modules up to date.
Each row is a question people ask before they move work off Make. Answers come from each product’s public pages.
Swipe the table to compare both platforms.
| Your question | Make Visual scenarios & AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| How do I build an agent? | Describe the job in chat and confirm the setup SpringBrand proposes, or fill in instructions, data sources, apps and skills in a form. | Drag modules onto a visual canvas to build scenarios; Make AI Agent (New) adds agents with tools, knowledge files and a test chat, in open beta. |
| Who decides the steps? | The agent plans the steps and picks the tools on each run. | You connect each module, router, iterator and filter; a Make agent picks from the tools you give it inside a scenario. |
| What happens while I’m offline? | On paid plans, agents run in the cloud on a schedule by day, week or set time and post results to Slack, Microsoft Teams or Lark. | Scenarios run on a schedule or instantly from webhooks; Free has a 15-minute minimum interval. |
| How does it get better between runs? | Each agent learns from results and feedback and remembers your preferences, formats and usual tools for the next run. | An agent remembers a conversation only when you set a thread ID; otherwise each run starts fresh. |
| What can it connect to? | A marketplace of Agents, Skills and 10,000+ APIs and plugins, built-in search, social, SEO and sales data, and your own Gmail, Slack or HubSpot. | Thousands of app integrations, plus HTTP requests and custom apps. |
| How many jobs can run at once? | 1 agent at a time on Free, 2 on Plus, 5 on Pro and 20 on Max. | Scenarios run per trigger within your credit allowance; Free allows 2 active scenarios. |
| Who on my team can use it? | Anyone with an agent’s link can run it; Team plans add Owner, Admin and Member roles and pooled credits, and Enterprise adds SSO and SCIM. | Teams plan adds team collaboration and shared templates; Enterprise adds governance options. |
| What will it cost? | Paid plans from $29 a month, or $23 billed annually; one credit balance, with an agent task using about 15–40 credits. | Core reported at $9 a month billed annually for 10,000 credits; most modules use 1 credit per operation, AI modules by tokens, and iterators multiply operations. |
| Where can I start for free? | Free plan: 300 credits on signup, then 100 a month; no credit card. | Free: 1,000 credits a month and 2 active scenarios. |
Tell SpringBrand what you need in plain language — no modules to drag, no fields to map. It proposes the agent’s setup, you confirm it, and the same conversation becomes the agent you run again.
Prefer to set it up yourself? Fill in the same four parts in a form: instructions, data sources (APIs), connected apps such as Gmail or Google Sheets, and skills. Either way, the agent keeps its instructions, its tools and what it learned from earlier runs.
Pull last week’s Google Ads and Meta results into one report and flag what to change.
Goal, inputs and the output you expect
Instructions, data sources, apps & skills
Rerun, schedule or share with the team
Most teams build and run agents in SpringBrand itself. If you already work in Claude Code, Codex or Cursor, SpringBrand also runs as an MCP server and plugin there, with the same tools and data sources.
Make agents can also call MCP tools from third-party servers inside a scenario. Compare which actions you need and how each product counts them.
Explore MCP client setupConnect SpringBrand’s MCP tools to your Claude Code session.
View Claude Code setupIn Make you drag modules onto a canvas, map fields, and add routers, iterators and error handlers. In SpringBrand you say what should happen — “collect yesterday’s orders and flag anything unusual” — and the agent works out the steps.
A visual scenario is easy to inspect and debug, which matters for fixed processes and data transformations. An agent suits work that changes from run to run, such as research, writing and reporting, where a canvas keeps growing — and the two can run side by side.
Explore the workflow exampleA clear update and an actionable next step.
The SpringBrand marketplace has three shelves: ready-made Agents by function — Sales, Marketing, HR and more — Skills that add expertise such as financial modelling, and APIs for data and tools. Start from a ready-made agent, or add a skill or API to your own.
Credits work across 10,000+ APIs and plugins. Search, social, SEO and sales data are built in — no API keys, including official Ahrefs and Semrush API access — so ten tool subscriptions and ten bills become one subscription and one bill.
For a Make alternative, check the modules your scenarios depend on — including HTTP calls and custom apps — and confirm each action is available in SpringBrand before you move a scenario.
Explore the marketplaceRead campaign results before the weekly report.
Research · Example capabilitySee which products and posts are gaining views.
Research · Example capabilityThe task guides the tool selection.
Illustrative categories. Check live availability and actions in the marketplace.
Upload documents, guidelines and product material to a company knowledge base, and agents follow that context in their answers and output. Connect Gmail, Google Sheets, Slack or HubSpot once, and the agent reads from and writes to them inside the permissions you set.
In this example, the agent reads a project brief and handoff notes and returns a short summary that cites each source and names the one question still open.
Make agents take knowledge files, and keep conversation memory only when you set a thread ID; otherwise each run starts fresh. Compare how each product carries context from one run to the next.
Explore Google Drive MCPThe prototype is ready for team review. The remaining dependency is the data handoff.
Schedule a task by day, by week or at a set time, and your agent runs it in the cloud while you are offline. Results and alerts land where your team works — Slack, Microsoft Teams or Lark — and you can @mention the agent in a channel to hand over the next task.
SpringBrand runs saved agents on a schedule: 3 daily tasks on Plus, 20 every 15 minutes on Pro, unlimited every 5 minutes on Max. Make scenarios run on a schedule or instantly from webhooks; on Make’s Free plan, scheduled runs have a 15-minute minimum interval.
Typical routines: a daily competitor and social mentions brief, a weekly ad report, new leads sent to the team. Each run teaches the agent your preferences, so start with a draft you review and let the schedule take over once the output is right.
Compare plans for recurring workExample routine · Every Monday
Selected project files and updates
Progress, blockers, and open questions
A draft report for the team
Scheduled tasks are included on Plus (3, daily), Pro (20, every 15 min) and Max (unlimited, every 5 min).
Start with the plans. Then price the same job end to end — the runs, the steps and the people who need it.
Plus · Monthly price; lower when billed annually
Core, billed annually ($10.59 monthly)
Prices checked October 23, 2026. SpringBrand prices are in USD. Credits and Make’s units buy different amounts of work, so no like-for-like savings are implied.
When comparing SpringBrand vs Make pricing, price the same job on both: how many operations a scenario run takes (iterators multiply them), how often it runs and which AI modules it uses.
Count every step needed to reach an acceptable result, including retries and AI steps. Make counts 1 credit per operation for most modules, AI modules by tokens, and iterators multiply operations.
Estimate how often the job runs and how many people trigger it. On SpringBrand, scheduled tasks and agents running at once are set by plan.
Include paid data sources and model choice. SpringBrand’s built-in data sources and models are paid from the same credit balance, so there are no separate API bills to add.
Find yourself below. Many teams end up using both.
A marketer who rebuilds the same weekly ad report on a canvas that keeps growing.
A builder who wants to see and control every module, router and filter on a canvas.
Start with the scenarios that keep growing or breaking — usually research, content and reporting. Keep the trigger and the expected result, and let the agent handle the modules in between.
Rebuild one of them as a SpringBrand agent, in chat or with the form. Run both in parallel for a week before you switch the old scenario off — and only switch once the agent’s output is as good and the schedule fits.
Explore a workflow exampleStart with a scenario that does research, content or reporting. Pure data syncs and transformations may be better left in Make.
Write down what starts the scenario and what a good result looks like. Describe that job to SpringBrand in plain language.
List each module, HTTP call and custom app. Connect those accounts in SpringBrand and check read and write permissions.
Run the agent alongside the scenario, then set its schedule. Switch the scenario off after a week of matching results.
Manual evaluation and setup. No automatic Make import is offered.
Answers on agents, scenarios, memory, credits, pricing and using both.
It is a good fit when your scenarios do research, writing or reporting that changes from run to run and keep growing on the canvas. You describe the job, review the result and save it as an agent. For heavy, fixed data transformations, Make’s visual scenarios remain a strong choice.
Make AI Agent (New) runs inside a scenario on the canvas and is in open beta. In SpringBrand the agent is the product: you build it by describing the job, it runs on its own schedule, and it improves from each run.
In Make most modules use 1 credit per operation, and an iterator runs the following modules once per item, so a scenario that processes 20 records uses many credits per run. AI modules also use credits by tokens. In SpringBrand an agent task uses about 15–40 credits.
Yes. It learns from results and feedback, remembers your team’s preferences, output formats and usual tools, and applies them on the next run. In Make, an agent keeps conversation memory only when you set a thread ID; otherwise each scenario run starts fresh.
Agents work from live data, the tools you allow and your company documents rather than from model memory alone, and many tasks return sources with the result. Review the first runs; the agent learns from your feedback, so later runs need fewer corrections.
Search the marketplace first — Agents, Skills and 10,000+ APIs and plugins. Connect your own accounts for the apps your work already lives in. For systems that need a custom connection, talk to us about Enterprise; a fixed HTTP call that already works can stay in Make.
Yes — and for many teams that is the right start. Keep the data syncs and transformations that already work in Make, and move the research, writing, screening and reporting jobs that change from run to run to SpringBrand.
There is no automatic import. Pick one scenario, write down its trigger, inputs and expected result, and describe that job to SpringBrand. Run both in parallel for a week before you switch the scenario off.
Make’s Core plan was reported at $9 a month billed annually, or $10.59 monthly, for 10,000 credits, with Pro and Teams at the same credit allowance. SpringBrand Plus is $29 a month, or $23 billed annually, for 3,000 credits; one subscription covers the models, APIs and data an agent uses, and top-ups are $5 per 1,000 credits. Credits mean different things in each product, so price one real job on both.
SpringBrand’s Free plan gives 300 credits on signup, then 100 credits a month, with no credit card and 1 agent at a time. Make also has a free plan with 1,000 credits a month and 2 active scenarios.
Stay with Make when you want to see and control every step on a canvas, transform a lot of data with routers and iterators, or already run many scenarios your team knows how to debug. You can also use both: scenarios for fixed steps, SpringBrand agents for jobs that need judgment.
Describe the job, review the result,
and save it as an agent that runs on schedule.
Comparison reviewed October 23, 2026. Product details can change.